THE INTERNALIZATION OF ISLAMIC MORAL VALUES IN COUNTERING THE DIGITAL GENERATION'S ETHICAL CRISIS: An Integrative Study of Al-Ghazali and Franz Rosenthal's Thought

Authors

  • Ahmad Fauzi Rahmatullah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia Author
    • Siti Nurhalimah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia Author

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.59623/3p7g8b03

      Keywords:

      Islamic Moral Internalization, Digital Ethics, Character Education, Online Disinhibition

      Abstract

      This study investigates strategies for internalizing Islamic moral values as a systematic response to the ethical crisis confronting the digital generation. The proliferation of digital technology has engendered dual consequences: the democratization of knowledge access and the concurrent erosion of moral foundations rooted in Islamic tradition. Employing a qualitative-descriptive approach grounded in critical library research (library research), the study analyzes the ethical thought of Franz Rosenthal as articulated in The Muslim Concept of Freedom (1960) and al-Ghazali's Bidayatul Hidayah (eleventh century, Indonesian edition 2019) as primary theoretical frameworks, triangulated with peer-reviewed empirical literature published between 2018 and 2023. Forty-seven articles meeting rigorous inclusion criteria were subjected to systematic content analysis. Findings reveal that the digital ethics crisis manifests across four interconnected dimensions: moral identity disorientation, online disinhibition, moral consumerism, and attention fragmentation. In response, the study identifies three evidence-based internalization strategies: (1) ta'wid digital  systematic ethical habituation aligned with al-Ghazali's methodology of repetitive virtuous practice; (2) uswah hasanah  reconstructed role-modeling adapted to the influencer-driven digital ecosystem; and (3) tarbiyah ruhiyah integration of spiritual formation into digital educational curricula. These strategies are synthesized into the Integrative Islamic Moral Internalization Model (MIINMI), a three-layered framework encompassing cognitive-theological, affective-spiritual, and behavioral-habitual dimensions. The study concludes that universal Islamic values amanah, 'adl, ihsan, and tawadu'  constitute contextually relevant and empirically supported antidotes to moral degradation in the digital era, offering a transcendent normative grounding that secular character education models lack.

      References

      Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (2019). Bidayatul Hidayah: Permulaan Jalan Hidayah. In Original work composed c. 11th century CE TR - Sunarto, A. Al-Miftah.

      Allison, B., & Rossner, M. (2023). Religion, morality, and online behavior: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Moral Education, 52(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2041234

      Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/

      Azhari, R., & Firdaus, M. (2023). Spiritual resilience in the digital age: The role of online dhikr communities among Indonesian Muslim youth. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 17(2), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.2023.0012

      Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.

      Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

      Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

      Fadhilah, N., Hakim, L., & Santoso, B. (2023). Dakwah digital dan transformasi moral: Studi efektivitas konten akhlak ulama muda Indonesia di media sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2023.92.189

      Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.

      Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.

      Hidayat, R., & Arifin, M. S. (2022). Internalisasi nilai-nilai Islam dalam pendidikan karakter digital: Kajian teoritis dan implikasi praktis. Ta’dib: Journal of Islamic Education, 25(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v25i1.18923

      Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

      Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika RI. (2022). Laporan tahunan literasi digital Indonesia 2022. Kominfo.

      Khaldun, I. (1967). Muqaddimah (F. Rosenthal (ed.); Translation Edition). Princeton University Press.

      Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row.

      Kurniawan, A., & Pratiwi, D. (2023). Sekularisasi parsial dan krisis komitmen moral pada generasi Z Muslim Indonesia. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 17(2), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2023.17.2.321

      Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Bantam Books.

      Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.

      Miskawayh, I. (1968). Tahdzib al-Akhlaq wa tathhir al-a’raq. Maktabah al-Khanji.

      Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi ke-40). Remaja Rosdakarya.

      Muhaimin. (2012). Paradigma pendidikan Islam: Upaya mengefektifkan pendidikan agama Islam di sekolah. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

      Mulyadi, S., & Hasanuddin, M. (2023). Generasi Z dan tantangan pendidikan akhlak di era digital: Perspektif pedagogik Islam. Jurnal Al-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.24235/tarbawi.v8i1.10234

      Nata, A. (2012). Pemikiran para tokoh pendidikan Islam. RajaGrafindo Persada.

      Nugroho, T., & Wahyuni, E. (2022). Ta’wid digital: Action research program pembiasaan etika Islam di media sosial pada siswa SMA Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia, 3(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.56185/jpaii.v3i1.234

      Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

      Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

      Ramadhan, F., & Suhardi, M. (2023). Perilaku penyebaran informasi tanpa verifikasi pada generasi Z Muslim: Survei nasional 12 kota Indonesia. Komunikasi: Indonesian Journal of Communication Studies, 16(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v16i2.19872

      Rosenthal, F. (1960). The Muslim concept of freedom prior to the nineteenth century. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004662100

      Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

      Sulistyowati, D., Fauzi, A., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Online disinhibition dan perilaku tidak etis mahasiswa Muslim: Studi longitudinal di tiga PTKIN Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 3(2), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.35719/jier.v3i2.1456

      Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the Net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill.

      Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious. Atria Books.

      Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Free Press.

      Yusuf, A. M., Sari, R. P., & Nurhayati, S. (2022). Pendidikan karakter Islami berbasis literasi digital: Model pengembangan untuk sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 12(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v12i1.60234

      Zulkifli, M., & Anwar, K. (2021). Relevansi pemikiran al-Ghazali tentang tarbiyah akhlak dalam konteks pendidikan digital kontemporer. Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 24(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.15408/jitk.v24i2.31209

      Downloads

      Published

      2025-06-22

      How to Cite

      THE INTERNALIZATION OF ISLAMIC MORAL VALUES IN COUNTERING THE DIGITAL GENERATION’S ETHICAL CRISIS: An Integrative Study of Al-Ghazali and Franz Rosenthal’s Thought. (2025). Karimiyah: Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, 4(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.59623/3p7g8b03

      Share

      Similar Articles

      41-44 of 44

      You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.